Web3 Meta-Crisis Wiki

zero knowledge proof (ZKP)

4 min read

Definition

Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs) are powerful cryptographic methods that allow one party (the prover) to prove to another party (the verifier) that a given statement is true, without revealing any information beyond the validity of the statement itself.

Core Properties

Every ZKP system must satisfy three fundamental properties:

Completeness

If the statement is true, an honest prover will always be able to convince an honest verifier.

Soundness

If the statement is false, a dishonest prover has a negligible probability of convincing an honest verifier that it is true.

Zero-Knowledge

The verifier learns nothing from the interaction except for the fact that the statement is true. No secret information is leaked.

Types of ZKPs

Interactive vs Non-Interactive

  • Interactive: Require back-and-forth communication between prover and verifier
  • Non-interactive: Single message proof that can be verified by anyone

zk-SNARKs

  • Zero-Knowledge Succinct Non-Interactive Argument of Knowledge
  • Small proof sizes, efficient to verify on-chain
  • Require trusted setup phase
  • Widely used in privacy-preserving applications

zk-STARKs

  • Zero-Knowledge Scalable Transparent Argument of Knowledge
  • No trusted setup required
  • More resistant to quantum computing attacks
  • Larger proof sizes but more transparent

Applications in Web3

Privacy-Preserving Transactions

  • Confidential transactions: Hide sender, receiver, and amount details
  • Zcash: Pioneer in privacy-preserving cryptocurrencies
  • Tornado Cash: Ethereum mixing protocol
  • Regulatory compliance: Prove eligibility without revealing identity

Scalability Solutions

  • ZK-Rollups: Verify thousands of off-chain transactions with single proof
  • zkSync, Starknet: Leading ZK-Rollup implementations
  • Dramatic throughput increase: From ~15 TPS to thousands of TPS
  • Lower costs: 10-100x reduction in transaction fees

Decentralized Identity

  • Selective disclosure: Prove attributes without revealing underlying data
  • Age verification: Prove “I am over 18” without revealing birthdate
  • Citizenship proof: Prove nationality without revealing passport details
  • Credential verification: Prove qualifications without revealing transcripts

Secure Voting

  • Anonymous voting: Prove eligibility without revealing identity or vote
  • Election integrity: Cryptographic guarantees of vote validity
  • Audit trails: Public verification without compromising privacy

Compliance and Verification

  • Regulatory compliance: Demonstrate compliance without exposing sensitive data
  • Business verification: Prove business credentials without revealing financials
  • Audit trails: Public verification of private processes

Fair Gaming

  • Randomness verification: Prove game randomness was not manipulated
  • Strategy verification: Prove player followed rules without revealing strategy
  • Cheat prevention: Cryptographic guarantees of fair play

Beneficial Potentials

Privacy Enhancement

  • Data sovereignty: Users control their own information
  • Selective disclosure: Share only necessary information
  • Censorship resistance: Private transactions cannot be blocked
  • Regulatory compliance: Meet requirements while preserving privacy

Scalability Solutions

  • High throughput: Process thousands of transactions off-chain
  • Low costs: Dramatically reduce transaction fees
  • Fast finality: Near-instant transaction confirmation
  • EVM compatibility: Maintain compatibility with existing applications

Identity and Authentication

  • Self-sovereign identity: Users own and control their identity
  • Portable credentials: Use same credentials across different services
  • Privacy-preserving: No central database of personal information
  • Interoperable: Work across different platforms and jurisdictions

Governance and Voting

  • Anonymous participation: Vote without fear of retribution
  • Verifiable results: Cryptographic proof of election integrity
  • Scalable democracy: Enable large-scale participatory governance
  • Audit trails: Public verification of private processes

Detrimental Potentials

Illicit Activities

  • Money laundering: Hide transaction origins and destinations
  • Sanctions evasion: Bypass financial restrictions
  • Terrorist financing: Fund illegal activities anonymously
  • Tax evasion: Hide financial transactions from authorities

Complexity and Vulnerability

  • Implementation errors: Highly complex cryptography prone to mistakes
  • Security vulnerabilities: Difficult to detect and fix
  • Quantum resistance: Some implementations vulnerable to quantum attacks
  • Key management: Secure key storage and recovery challenges

Regulatory Challenges

  • AML/CFT conflicts: Privacy features conflict with anti-money laundering
  • Exchange delisting: Platforms may be delisted from major exchanges
  • Legal uncertainty: Unclear regulatory status in many jurisdictions
  • Enforcement challenges: Difficult for authorities to investigate crimes

Technical Implementation

Cryptographic Primitives

  • Elliptic curves: Mathematical foundation for many ZKP systems
  • Hash functions: Cryptographic hash functions for commitments
  • Polynomial commitments: Mathematical structures for proof systems
  • Fiat-Shamir heuristic: Convert interactive proofs to non-interactive

Development Frameworks

  • Circom: Domain-specific language for ZK circuits
  • SnarkJS: JavaScript library for zk-SNARKs
  • Arkworks: Rust library for ZK proof systems
  • Libsnark: C++ library for ZK proof systems

Applications

  • Privacy coins: Zcash, Monero
  • Layer 2 scaling: zkSync, Starknet, Polygon zkEVM
  • Identity systems: Civic, uPort, Sovrin
  • Voting systems: Vocdoni, Aragon

References

Graph View

Backlinks